February 16, 2026
Kentake Page
Image default
Black CanadianHerstoryMaafa

Marie-Joseph Angelique: Symbol of Black resistance in Canada

In 1734, Marie-Joseph Angélique was accused of setting a fire that destroyed the city’s merchants’ quarter in Montreal. Authorities claimed that Angélique started the blaze in an attempt to escape captivity. She was subsequently convicted, tortured, and executed by hanging on June 21, 1734. Although it remains uncertain whether she was truly responsible for the fire, Angélique’s story endures as a powerful symbol of resistance and the struggle for freedom.

Angélique was born around 1705 on the island of Madeira, Portugal. Few details are known about her early life, but it is believed she was first held in Portugal, which was an active hub in the Atlantic trafficking. As a teenager, Angélique was likely sold to the Flemish merchant Nichus Block. She was then transported by ship to North America, possibly passing through Flanders (in present-day northern Belgium), an area with strong trading connections to Portugal.

Art by Dan BullerKit Lang, Incendiary, Marie-Joseph Angelique, mixed media, 2012Art by Annie Beaugrand-Champagne
Initially, Marie-Joseph Angélique lived in New England before being “enchained” by François Poulin de Francheville, a French businessman, who brought her to his home in Montreal. After de Francheville’s death, soon after her arrival, Angélique remained captive by his widow, Thérèse de Couagne. It was Thérèse who gave her the name “Angélique,” in memory of her deceased daughter.
 
Marie-Joseph Angélique was known for her fiery temper, stubbornness, and strong will. Shortly after arriving in Montreal, she entered into a romantic relationship with François Thibault, a Europeean servant employed by the Francheville widow. Their relationship was met with disapproval from the Montreal community.In the winter of 1734, the couple attempted a daring escape, fleeing by night across the frozen St. Lawrence River. Their goal was to reach New England and, eventually, return to Europe. However, severe weather conditions forced them to stop near Montreal, where they were soon discovered by the militia and returned to the city.
 

Angélique was sent back to the widow Francheville, and her intended escape went unpunished. Thibault, by contrast, was imprisoned. Angélique continued to visit him during his imprisonment, providing him with food and support, despite her mistress’s disapproval. Thibault was released two months later, on April 8th, 1734, two days before the fire of Montreal.

Soon after, Angélique ran away with Thibault. Her intent was to return to Portugal, the land of her birth. The couple set fire to Angélique’s bed at Alexis Monière’s home — where Francheville had chosen to move them temporarily — and fled in the direction of New England, where they hoped to catch a ship bound for Europe. Two weeks later, Angélique and Thibault were tracked down by the police in nearby Chambly. Angélique was returned to her captor to await transport to Québec City, and Thibault was imprisoned. Upon returning to Montréal, Angélique reiterated that she would burn down the house because she wanted to be free.

On the evening of Saturday, 10 April 1734, a large portion of Montréal — the merchants’ quarter — was destroyed by fire. At least 46 buildings, mainly homes, were burnt, plus the convent and hospital of the Hôtel-Dieu de Montréal. Angélique was accused of starting the fire and arrested by the police on 11 April. She was taken to court the following morning, where she was charged with arson, a capital crime punishable by death, torture or banishment. In the French legal system of the 18th century, the accused was presumed guilty, and in New France, there were no trials by jury; instead, there were inquisitorial tribunals in which the defendant was required to prove her innocence. Lawyers were banned from practising in the colony by Louis XIV.

The arrest of Angélique initiated an unusually lengthy judicial process. Her trial, lasting six weeks, was rare in New France, where most cases concluded in just a few days. Twenty-two individuals from various backgrounds—rich and poor, men and women—testified against Marie-Joseph Angélique. While all admitted they had not witnessed her start the fire, they were nonetheless unanimously convinced of her guilt. Remarkably, only her captor, the widow Francheville, defended Angélique, maintaining her belief in Angélique’s innocence.
 
Despite the widespread presumption of her guilt, the presiding judge, Pierre Raimbault—known for his harsh rulings—lacked concrete evidence against Angélique. This changed after six weeks, when a new witness suddenly emerged: Amable Lemoine Monière, the five-year-old daughter of merchant Alexis Lemoine. Under oath, the child claimed to have seen Angélique carrying a shovel full of coals to the attic of the Francheville house just before the fire broke out.
 
Amable’s testimony sealed Angélique’s fate. Despite her continued declarations of innocence, she was condemned to death. Before her execution, she was subjected to the torture of the boot—wooden planks bound to her legs, crushing the bones—to force her to name accomplices. Under this torture, Angélique confessed to the crime, but pleaded for mercy and insisted she had acted alone.
 
Following the six-week trial, Angélique was found guilty and sentenced to death. Initially, she was to have her hands cut off and be burned alive. On appeal to the superior court in Québec City, the death penalty was upheld, but the most gruesome aspects of the sentence were reduced. Angélique would be tortured, hanged, and then her body burned. She returned to Montréal to await execution. Throughout the proceedings in both Montréal and Québec, Angélique consistently denied setting the fire.
 
On the morning of June 21, 1734, Angélique was tortured in her jail cell using the brodequins, a medieval device designed to crush the leg. Torture was a standard component of 18th-century prosecution, intended to force confessions. Under this brutal treatment, Angélique confessed to setting the fire, but steadfastly refused to implicate Claude Thibault as a co-conspirator, despite the judges’ belief that they acted together.
 
After enduring torture, Angélique—dressed in a white chemise and carrying a burning torch, the symbol of her alleged crime—was placed in a cart and taken to the portal of Notre-Dame Basilica. There, she confessed and begged forgiveness from God, the king, and the people. She was then hanged by Mathieu Léveillé, a Black man in captivity who was made to serve as royal executioner. Angélique’s body was displayed on a gibbet for two hours before being burned on a pyre at 7:00 p.m.; her ashes were scattered to the four winds.
 
The burning of Montréal, along with Angélique’s arrest and trial, reveals much about the nature of captivity in Canada—a legal institution that endured for over two centuries. It is possible that Angélique did not set the fire. Nevertheless, she made an ideal scapegoat: Black, captive, poor, and a foreigner, she was a social outcast in every respect. Angélique had no rights that New France or European society would acknowledge.
 
On the other hand, Angélique may well have set the fire. She had many grievances against European society in Montréal: she had been enchained, deprived of her freedom and human rights, and taken from a homeland she loved. In Montréal, Angélique had attempted to escape at least once, only to be thwarted. Arson had been involved in that earlier attempt. Centuries later, Marie-Joseph Angélique stands as a symbol of Black resistance and the enduring fight for freedom.

Cooper_Book

Some historians, such as Denyse Beaugrand-Champagne—author of Le Procès de Marie-Josèphe Angélique (2004)—maintain that Angélique did not start the fire. They argue she was merely the unfortunate victim of incriminating circumstances, rumors, and discrimination. Others, such as historian and poet Afua Cooper, author of The Hanging of Angélique: The Untold Story of Canadian Slavery and the Burning of Old Montreal (2007), believe that Angélique purposely set the fire as an act of rebellion—a desperate cry for freedom on behalf of all enchained people. Cooper dedicated 15 years of research to uncovering Angélique’s story.
 
History may never reveal whether Marie-Joseph Angélique was truly responsible for the fire that consumed Montreal. Yet, her story—and the stories of those she represents—remain essential to remember.

See also: Ten Iconic Black Women of the Maafa


Sources:
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca-en/article/marie-joseph-angelique/
http://activehistory.ca/2012-09-marie-joseph-angelique-remembering-the-arsonist-slave-of-montreal/

Acknowledgement: This post was updated on 7th February 2026. The featured image was created by ChatGPT under the author’s direction.

Kentake Page
Average rating:  
 0 reviews

 
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Invalid email address

Related posts

Mme. Abomah: The African Giantess who was once the tallest woman in the world

Meserette Kentake

Edward Garrison Walker: The son of David Walker

Meserette Kentake

Quamina – Guyana National Hero: involved in the Demerara rebellion of 1823

Meserette Kentake

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More